The authors of the AUSTAL2000 use "volume sources distributed over the entire calculation area" and receive indefinite expressions for the calculation of soil concentrations. They manipulate their algorithm and leave it to others to uncover this hoax.

Deposition flows are directed in the opposite direction to the positive concentration gradient and cannot be determined arbitrarily with regard to amount and direction

In the case of sedimentation and deposition, the soil concentrations are calculated speculatively. The authors of the AUSTAL2000 manipulate their algorithm and leave it to others to uncover this machination. Although the reference solutions of the authors of the AUSTAL2000 cannot be recalculated due to a lack of physics and mathematics, there are still a few attempts to achieve equivalence. The excellent algorithms of the affected engineering offices are, however, discretized beforehand through expert opinions from the protagonists of AUSTAL2000 and court judgments. It turns out, however, that one relies more on the superficiality of the Federal Environment Agency (UBA) than that they deny their excellent propagation models. The deceptive Austalism leads to a rejection of all non-university research and brings the UBA itself into distress.

Share by: