Austal2000, Manipulieren, Täuschen, Tricksen

The authors of the AUSTAL2000 want to bring about equivalence to the correct reference solutions. But you deny the correctness of the correct solutions beforehand. Cheating, manipulating and tricking are presumably their preferred tools.

Once the solutions according to Schenk (2015) are supposed to be wrong, and another time one wants to bring about an equivalence to them

With the publications Trukenmüller (2016) one wants to bring about an equivalence to the correct reference solution according to Schenk (2015). The author of this article deals with this publication and states that it is simply a deception, as explained in more detail in Schenk (2020). The authors of AUSTAL equate their wrong reference solution with the correct solution. You get a simple algebraic equation and realize that there is no identity. You are now renaming variables and referring to the deposition speed vd their wrong solution from now on vdJanicke. The algebraic equation is now solved for the second deposition velocity vd of the correct solution. At the end of the invoice it will be renamed vdSchenk. The accusation of intent to deceive is justified.

a. You know about truck mills

et al. (2015) that both solutions

are different. With

intent to manipulate

nevertheless they will be the same

set. Left and right

the algebraic equation

stand two times

Deposition Velocities

b. Your own deposition speed

vd is made with the intention of being an equivalency

renamed to pretend vdJanicke.

After the second

Deposition speed vd

the algebraic equation is solved.

c. In the end it will be the second

Deposition speed vd

cleverly renamed in vdSchenk.

The accusation of deception according to Schenk (2020) is justified.

The author of Trukenmüller (2016) is a specialist guide for AUSTAL2000 at the Federal Environment Agency and is also responsible for dispersion calculations. He pretends to be the author of this essay. As later becomes apparent in Trukenmüller (2017), however, he could not have been the author of this ingenuity, because the definitions of the deposition velocities given in Trukenmüller (2016) contradict his later creations, Trukenmüller (2017). The specialist guide for AUSTAL2000 cannot be attributed to the authors of the AUSTAL2000, nor is he the author of Trukenmüller (2016). In Trukenmüller (2017) he explains that he works in the Federal Environment Agency on a tax-financed basis and that he cannot afford to waste working time.

It is not credible that one can assume such nationwide responsibility for research in the field of modeling the spread of air pollutants.

literature

Trukenmüller A (2016)

Equivalence of

Reference solutions from

Schenk and Janicke. treatise

Federal Environment Agency Dessau-Rosslau

S: 1 - 5

Schenk ** R (2015a)

AUSTAL2000 is not

validated. Immission control 01.15

S: 10 – 2