The dispute about the validity of the AUSTAL2000 dispersion model has come to an end

The prologue describes the development of the AUSTAL2000 as well as all the contradictions of the first applications. The plot explains how tricky and defamatory the authors of the AUSTAL2000 try to cover up their ignorance. In the epilogue, the authors of the AUSTAL2000 are asked to explain how one can recalculate nature experiments with dispersion models, which violate all the fundamentals of mathematics and mechanics.

Although the authors of AUSTAL consider the derivation of the reference solution described in the replica to be wrong, they would like to twist in the following treatise Trukenmüller (2016) to show an "equivalence of the reference solutions by Schenk and Janicke". This would have cleared up all the contradictions, but the publication Schenk (2020) justifies that this is simply a deception. One time one declares the results of Schenk (2015a) to be false, and another time one would like to bring about equivalence. This elaborate hoax is right to claim to be trying to confuse the public. Upon request, this intelligence was still sent to interested offices and authorities in 2020.

literature

Literature:

Axenfeld F, Janicke L, Münch J (1984)

Development of a model for

Calculation of the dust precipitation.

Environmental research plan of the Federal Minister

indoor air pollution control,

Research report 104 02 562,

Dornier System GmbH Friedrichshafen, on behalf of

Federal Environment Agency Janicke (2002) AUSTAL 2000

Program description. Research metric

of the Federal Environment Agency UFOPLAN

200 43 256, DunumSchenk R. (2014a) Expertise on Austal 2000.

Report on behalf of the United Warsteiner Kalksteinindustrie, Westkalk archive and IBSSchenk R. (2014b) Austal2000 method

is validated questionably, Stein & Kies, 132, p.8-9 Schenk R (2015a) AUSTAL2000 is not

validated. Immissionsschutz 01.15 S: 10 - 21Schenk R (2015b) Reply to the article

“Reply to the criticism from Schenk

AUSTAL2000 in Immissionsschutz 01/2015 ".

Immissionsschutz 04.15 S: 189 - 191 Schenk R (2020) Integral sentences and

     numerical comparative calculations for

     the validity of the dispersion model

     for air pollutants AUSTAL2000 .

     Environmental Systems Research 28 p: 1-28,

Schenk Environ Syst Res (2020) 9:28, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-020-00181-6

Trukenmüller A (2017) Opinions

Federal Environment Agency from February 10, 2017 and March 23, 2017. Dessau-Rosslau,

  IBS Archiv, S. 1–15

Schenk R (2020) Integral sentences

   and numerical comparative

   calculations for the validity of

   the dispersion model for air

   pollutants AUSTAL2000

   Environmental Systems 

   Research 28 p: 1-28, Schenk

About Syst Res (2020) 9:28,

    https://doi.org/10.1186

   s40068-020-00181-6 

Schenk R (2015a) AUSTAL2000

is not validated. Immission control

  01.15 S: 10 - 21

Schenk R (2018) Deposition Mans Storage

   And Not Loss. Environmental Systems  Research16 p: 1-14, Schenk Environ Syst

Res (2018) 7:16 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-018-0119-8TA Luft (2002) First General

Administrative regulation for the Federal Immission Control Act

(Technical instructions for keeping clean

der Luft - TA Luft) of July 24, 2002.

   GMBl. 2002 S. 511–605Trukenmüller A, Bächlin W, Bahmann W,

Förster A, Hartmann U, Hebbinghaus H, Janicke U, Müller WJ, Nielinger J, Petrich R,

Schmonsees N, Strotkötter U, Wohlfahrt T, Wurzler S (2015) Response to criticism

from Schenk to AUSTAL2000 in Immissionsschutz 01/2015.

Immissionsschutz 03/2015 S: 114 - 126 Trukenmüller A (2016) Equivalence of

Reference solutions from Schenk and Janicke. Treatise Federal Environment Agency

   Dessau-Rosslau S: 1 – 5