The events around AUSTAL2000, its emergence, distribution and importance can be described as Austalism. It cannot be denied that it is allegedly a deceptive Austalism. All characteristics are applicable.

Denial of the state of science,

such as Berljand's theory for modeling and calculating the spread of air pollutants, the recognition of the deposition rate as a material constant and the disregard of all the fundamentals of mathematics and mechanics, such as the validity of integral theorems for checking mass balances and observance of all main and conservation laws for Confirmation of basic thermodynamic laws.

Decades of unhindered dissemination of pseudoscientific views,

For example, with the time span of more than 31 years in which the authors of AUSTAL2000 and editors of their own journals in it and in VDI guidelines as well as in the context of a large number of research projects and model developments funded by the UBA their wrong propagation theory, according to which, for example, deposition loss and not Preservation means disseminating and, as the organizers of a non-university UBA research, were able to update pseudoscientific theories according to which, for example, the deposition speed is not a material constant, but only a measure for the parameterization of deposition flows.

Abuse of state authority,

in which one tries to silence critics with the weight of state authority, as for example with the publication Trukenmüller et al. (2015), in which 14 authors with officially appointed functions, such as those responsible for dispersion calculations at the UBA, sworn and non-obligated experts, senior employees in state environmental offices, former heads of cross-national working groups for immission control, representatives of trade supervisory offices, meteorologists and those responsible for immission control selected engineering offices, were able to falsely spread that deposition means loss and not storage, as well as the author of the publications, Trukenmüller (2016) and Trukenmüller (2017), tried with falsification and ignorance to reject all objections to the validity of the AUSTAL2000 dispersion model.

Slander and disparagement,

For example with the publication UBA (2015), in which one knowingly assumes with all government authority that their correct solutions can be traced back to physical incomprehension, and in Trukenmüller (2016), contrary to UBA (2015), we want to prove that it would lead to the correct solutions exist, and with the publications Trukenmüller (2017), in which an attempt is made to slander and disparage critics of the pseudoscientific views of the authors of the AUSTAL2000.

With its publications, the UBA itself provides convincing evidence of the spread and existence of deceptive Austalism.

Trukenmüller * u A, Bächlin W, Bahmann

W, Forester A, Hartmann U,

Hebbinghaus H, Janicke U, Müller

   WJ, Nielinger J, Petrich R,

Schmonsees N, Strotkötter U, welfare

  T, Wurzler S (2015)

Reply to the criticism from Schenk

   AUSTAL2000 in

Immissionsschutz 01/2015.

Immission control 03/2015 S: 114 - 126

Trukenmüller * u A (2017) Statements

Federal Environment Agency from

02/10/2017 and 03/23/2017. Dessau-

   Rosslau, IBS Archiv, S. 1–15

Trukenmüller *

A (2016) equivalence

of the reference solutions from Schenk

and Janicke. treatise

Federal Environment Agency Dessau-Rosslau S: 1 - 5

UBA (2015)*https://www.

     umweltbundesamt.de/themen

/ air / control strategies

/ dispersion-models-for-

system-related / faq # a13-how-is-the-

criticism-from-rchenk- in

     quotimmissionsschutzquot-012015-

to rate